Search Results for "Customs tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Customs tariff"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Writ Petition on Inter-State Transfer of Input Tax Credit on Amalgamation Under Section 18(3) CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner transferee company in Maharashtra challenged the GSTN portal's refusal to accept Form GST ITC-02 for unutilized ITC from a Goa transferor, arguing that Section 18(3) and Rule 41 impose no state-based restriction.

10 Jul 2025

The writ petition arose from a dispute over transfer of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) following a scheme of amalgamation sanctioned by the Nationa...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Input Services Used in Exported Goods. Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of credit on input services used in manufacture of exported goods, and the definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) includes services used in relation to export.

9 Nov 2011

The judgment involves five appeals filed by four companies (M/s. Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shridhar Castings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shiva Steel Indu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Manufacturers in Sikkim Seeking Exemption from Education Cess and NCCD. Exemption Notification Strictly Construed; Cesses Not Covered as They Were Imposed by Separate Finance Acts After the Notification.

19 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by M/s. Unicorn Industries and Akshay Ispat and Ferro Alloys Private Limited against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty on Mosquito Coils Classified as Insecticides — Unjust Enrichment Defence Rejected. Product Held to Be Insecticide by CEGAT and Supreme Court; Duty Paid Under Protest and Burden Not Passed on to Consumers, Hence Refund Cannot Be Denied Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

20 Jul 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Chemicals Limited and its Managing Director, held a Central Excise Registration for manufacturing 'Toys, Brand Mosquito C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

24 Dec 2014

The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

19 Oct 2015

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Circular Denying Export Incentives to Purchasers from 100% EOU. Clarification That Exports Through EOUs Are Ineligible Under VKGUY Scheme Is Valid and Not Contrary to Foreign Trade Policy.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves appeals by M/s. Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills and others against the Union of India and others, challenging a circular dated 21st Jan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Limitation Case — Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond One-Year Period from Relevant Date is Time-Barred. The court held that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be invoked without establishing suppression of facts or fraud by the assessee.

1 Apr 2015

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (Large Tax Payers Unit), Bengaluru, filed appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India’s Application to Record Satisfaction of Decree Under Order 21 Rule 2 CPC in Customs Duty Refund Case — Payment Under Section 46(5A) Income Tax Act Treated as Garnishee Payment and Not Defeated by Technical Objections. Collector of Customs’ Payment on Behalf of Union of India Held to Constitute Payment by Judgment Debtor, and Super-tax is a Species of Income Tax for Notice Purposes.

28 Mar 1969

The dispute arose after the respondent firm, Soorajmull Nagarmull, obtained decrees against the Union of India for refund of excess customs duty levie...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)