Search Results for "CESTAT order"

329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Excise Department’s Appeals Against CESTAT Order Remanding Cases for Denial of Natural Justice. Court Holds That Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents to Assessee Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Despite Department’s Claim of Assessee’s Delaying Tactics.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed a batch of seven Excise Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Pre-Deposit Condition in Central Excise Remand Order — Condition of Rs.40 Lakhs Deposit Set Aside as Unwarranted. CESTAT Cannot Impose Pre-Deposit Condition While Remanding Matter for De Novo Adjudication Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, M/s Dhariwal Industries Limited, a manufacturer of Panmasala and Gutka registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was issued a show...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.

The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...