Search Results for "Bonafide purchaser"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030005792015_1

The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction and Declaration Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The appellant, Sri B.N. Devaraju, filed a second appeal before the Karnataka High Court against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deeds. Consent order in previous suit does not create estoppel against defendants in subsequent suit for different reliefs.

The respondents-plaintiffs filed Special Civil Suit No. 102/2020 seeking cancellation of registered sale deeds, perpetual injunction, and alternativel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...