High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Assistant Commissioner's Order"
5378 result(s) found
Found 5378 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notices Quashed for Being Time-Barred and Lacking Proper Sanction. Reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16 were issued beyond the four-year time limit under Section 149 without any allegation of failure to disclose material facts, and the sanction under Section 151 was granted without proper application of mind.
4 Aug 2023The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.
27 Nov 2020The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.
14 Nov 2024The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...
- 514
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Management's Petition and Dismisses Teacher's Petition in Service Dispute — School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Without Back Wages Upheld. Teacher's Appointment as Shikshan Sevak Was Valid and Termination Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 Was Illegal.
19 Dec 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the management (Shri Gurukul Shikshan Prasarak Mandal...
- 129
Supreme Court
High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.
28 Apr 2025The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...
- 209
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.
13 Mar 2026The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...
- 52
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.
16 Aug 2019Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
1 Jan 1970This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...
- 89
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
1 Jan 2020The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...
- 393
