Search Results for "Article 348"

286 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recruitment Advertisement of District Courts for Violating Disability Reservation Law. High Court on Administrative Side Held to be 'Government Establishment' under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016; Directed to Identify Posts and Provide 4% Reservation.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by the National Federation of the Blind Maharashtra and a public interest litigati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...