Search Results for "Article 123 Limitation Act"

387 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 387 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Attachment and Proposed Sale of Residential Bungalow under Income Tax Act, 1961, on Ground of Limitation. Petitioner Contends That Tax Recovery Officer's Action Is Time-Barred Under Rule 68B of Second Schedule.

The petitioner, a 60-year-old Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consignor's Claim Against Indian Railways for Loss of Goods Under Implied Bailment. Implied Contract of Bailment Found Between Consignor and E.P. Railway Despite Initial Contract with Pakistan Railway Under Indian Contract Act, 1872 Sections 148 and 194.

The dispute arose from the non-delivery of goods consigned in 1947 from Quebec, Pakistan, to New Delhi, India. The consignor, Amar Singh, booked goods...