High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Aggrieved Parties"
14752 result(s) found
Found 14752 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.
1 Apr 2026The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...
- 203
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeals Against Interim Orders Restraining LCIA Arbitration in Convertible Debentures Dispute. Court Examines Whether Civil Suit to Restrain Arbitration is Maintainable Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act and Interprets Arbitration Clause.
26 Sep 2025The litigation arises from a dispute over a Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Subscription and Securities Holders Agreement dated 21.06.2013 between...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.
30 Aug 2023The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.
31 Mar 2012The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Dispute Over Sale of Shares and Property Rights. Court holds that the applicant failed to make out a prima facie case for interim relief under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as the balance of convenience did not favour granting injunction against the plaintiffs.
30 Nov -0001The present interim application was filed by the original defendant No. 1, Babasaheb Neelkant Kalyani, in a suit for specific performance and injuncti...
- 121
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Title Dispute, Holds Res Judicata Not Applicable to Findings in Dismissed Suits. The State was not required to appeal findings in suits dismissed against it, and such findings do not bar the State from contesting the same issue in a related suit where a decree was passed against it.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals against a High Court order that dismissed the State's appeal in a land title dispute on grounds of res judicata. ...
- 204
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in MSMED Act Dispute Over Facilitation Council's Order. Dispute Involved Whether Rejection Order by Council Constitutes an Award Under Section 18 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, Affecting Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
23 Sep 2021The dispute originated from a commercial transaction where the respondent, a supplier under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 20...
- 279
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Petitions for Enforcement and Setting Aside of Foreign Arbitration Award — Partial Award on Jurisdiction Upheld; Challenge under Section 34 Considered Inappropriate for Foreign Award. Enforcement of Award under Sections 44-49 Proceeded While Section 34 Petition Found Not Maintainable Against a Foreign Award Governed by English Law.
9 May 2014The dispute arose from an agency agreement between Perma Container (UK) Line Limited (claimant), a UK company, and Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. L...
- 20
