Search Results for "zilla panchayat"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "zilla panchayat"

596 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Absorption from Village Panchayat to Zilla Parishad Under 10% Quota. Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right as Seniority List Not Finalized and No Vacancies Identified.

10 Nov 2025

The petitioners, Vijay Dinkar Wagh, Dnyandeo Pandharinath Bendale, and Bhagwat Ramkrushna Zope, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

1 Jul 2025

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Zilla Panchayat Review Order in Property Dispute — President Lacks Statutory Power to Review Own Orders Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Review Order Dated 22-02-2014 Set Aside as Void Ab Initio for Absence of Express Statutory Provision.

15 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Sri U.V. Sridhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Road Development Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Ultra Vires Government Resolution. The court held that the corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 modifying the Government Resolution dated 17.03.2020 for internal road development of 127 villages was issued without hearing the Gram Panchayats and is ultra vires.

28 Jan 2021

The petitioners, four Gram Panchayats from Osmanabad District, challenged a corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 issued by the Secretary, Rural Development an...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dated 28-02-2018 Dismissing Writs Filed by Gram Panchayat Office-Bearers. Appeals Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act Question Correctness of Single Judge’s Refusal to Grant Relief in Panchayat Leadership Disputes.

12 Oct 2018

This batch of writ appeals was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 before a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

9 May 2014

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Validity of Asset Declaration Rule for Panchayat Members. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 4 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Declaration of Assets by Elected Members of Taluka and Zilla Panchayats) Rules, 2010 is Ultra Vires Section 175-A of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

18 Nov 2013

The petitioners, elected members of Taluka and Zilla Panchayats from various districts in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)