Search Results for "workmen representation"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Cut-off Date for Workmen Dues in Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills. Official Liquidator's Calculation Up to Appointment of Provisional Liquidator Challenged by Workmen Seeking Dues Up to Winding Up Order.

The matter concerns a company application filed by five workmen of M/s Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd., which was wound up. The company had approximately 2970...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Disputes Act Case, Remands for Adjudication on Merits. Settlement Not Binding on Workmen When Rule 58(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 Not Complied With, Despite Union's Consent.

The dispute originated from the dismissal/retirement of workman Shibban Lal by the management of Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. The D.C.M. (City S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Addresses Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal and CGIT Order in BEL Strike Case. Allegations of Abusive Conduct and Obstruction During Strike Result in Dismissal Under Certified Standing Orders.

The workman, formerly an Accountant at Bharat Electronics Limited, was dismissed from service following a strike on 11 December 2013. He joined the co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Customary Puja Bonus Despite Ex Gratia Declarations. Puja Bonus Recognized as Customary Payment When Unbroken Series, Long Period, Uniform Rate, and Paid in Loss Years, Even if Employer Previously Labeled it Ex Gratia.

The dispute arose between Graham Trading Co. (India) Ltd., the employer, and its workmen regarding the payment of puja bonus for the year 1953. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act. Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Industrial Court Can Assume Jurisdiction.

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Industrial Court which had dismissed its a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...