Search Results for "wheeling charges"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the original bill, not from discovery of a billing mistake.

The case involves a dispute between the Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (appellant/licensee) and Rahamatullah Khan alias Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Power Tariff Dispute — State Directed to Compensate Appellant for Delayed Transmission Line Construction. Contractual Obligation to Provide Free Power Under Clause 10 of Agreement Cannot Be Avoided Due to KSEB's Failure to Complete Transmission Line.

The case involves an appeal by Indsil Hydro Power & Manganese Ltd against the State of Kerala and the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...