Search Results for "vicarious liability"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Issued as Security — Endorsement on Cheque and Plaint Admission Confirm Security Purpose, No Legally Enforceable Debt Exists

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Directors and Managing Director of R.L. Steels & Energy Limited, quashing the criminal complaint un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Director in Minimum Wages Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint Failed to Establish Director Was In-Charge of Company's Business Under Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Making Prosecution Unmaintainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed against Dayle De'Souza, a director of Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., alleging violations of the Minimum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Specific Averments of Role in Company Affairs.

The case involves a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1 (complainant) under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company, No Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1, Ashwin Ramesh Mittal, under Section 138 ...