Search Results for "urban development authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "urban development authority"

930 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 930 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Consideration of Layout Plan Approval Despite Lapsed Scheme. Scheme Notification Under Sections 17(1) and 17(3) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 Lapses After 5 Years Without Section 19 Declaration.

2 Dec 2024

The State of Karnataka and the Deputy Commissioner of Vijayapura filed a writ appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.201785/2023...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Development Charges Under U.P. Urban Planning Act, Quashes Other Levies as Unauthorized. The Court holds that only development fees under Section 15(2-A) are valid, while inspection fee, sub-division charges, stacking charges, and impact fee imposed via executive orders under Section 41 are ultra vires and violative of Article 265.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court disposed of a group of appeals arising from common judgment(s) of the Allahabad High Court concerning the validity of various demand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Notifications in Urban Development Case Due to Erroneous High Court Findings on Mala Fides and Statutory Interpretation. Notifications Under Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 and Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Were Valid as High Court's Reliance on Definition of 'Colony' and Insufficient Mala Fides Findings Were Legally Unsustainable.

16 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from the State of Haryana and Town Planning Authorities appealing against a High Court judgment that set aside two notifications: on...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.

3 Oct 2019

The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition in Industrial Model Township, Manesar — Base Rate of Rs. 20 Lakhs Per Acre with 12% Annual Increase Applied Uniformly Across All Phases. The Court affirmed that no distinction should be made between different land types for compensation, and the same rate applies to all lands acquired for the same public purpose.

30 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from the acquisition of about 1500 acres of land for the development of Industrial Mode...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

8 Aug 2018

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Land Not Acquired Due to Non-Compliance with Section 10(3) and Section 11(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The court held that mere notification does not vest land in the State without actual possession, and exemption applications under Sections 20 and 21 must be considered before declaring land surplus.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Bhagwant Dharmaraj Radke and Omprakash @ Dipchand Durgaprasad Agrawal against the State of Mahara...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)