Search Results for "unspecified period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "unspecified period"

65 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Revisional Order in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Limitation Bar Rejected. Court holds that complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 were filed within limitation period as the period of limitation commences from the date of receipt of notice of demand, not from the date of dishonour.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Kartik Harshad Jhaveri, proprietor of Care Comp Computer Solutions, filed three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Arising from Order in CMA. The matter involved an application under an unspecified provision and challenges an interlocutory order passed in the trial court.

24 Apr 2025

The limited available text indicates that the Bombay High Court heard a Civil Revision Application No. 728 of 2023 filed by Shaikh Mohammad Azahar Moh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bail in Elgar Parishad Case: High Court Erred in Remanding Bail Application Without Considering Merits Despite Supplementary Chargesheet. The Court held that the High Court must consider the entire material, including supplementary chargesheet, while exercising its bail jurisdiction under Section 439 CrPC, and the bar under Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 requires a prima facie assessment of the accusation.

15 Apr 2024

The appellant, Shoma Kanti Sen, was arrested on 06.06.2018 in connection with FIR No. 04/2018 registered at Vishrambaug Police Station, Pune, alleging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CBI's Appeal Against Grant of Default Bail to Accused in Corruption Case - Statutory Bail Right Extinguished Upon Filing of Charge Sheet Under Section 167(2) CrPC. Accused's Detention After Cancellation of Interim Bail Under Chapter XXXIII CrPC Does Not Count Towards 90-Day Period for Default Bail, as Charge Sheet Was Filed Before Bail Application Decided.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a judgment and order dated 30.09.2022 passed by the Hi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Prima Facie Case Established for Temporary Injunction. The court set aside the trial court's order and remanded for fresh consideration of the injunction application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

4 Mar 2020

The appellant, M/s Lumbini Gardens Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the respondents (State of Karnataka and others) from unl...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition of KSRTC Driver for Overtime Allowance, Quashes Circular Denying Payment. Circular Without Force of Law Cannot Negative Employee's Legal Claim; Denial of Overtime Allowance Violates Articles 23 and 300-A of the Constitution.

28 Nov 2019

The petitioner, G.M. Poovaiah, a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order Under Rule 10(2)(a) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 — Suspension Set Aside as Not Based on Detention Beyond 48 Hours. The Court held that the suspension order was invalid because the petitioner was not detained in custody for a period exceeding 48 hours, as required under Rule 10(2)(a), and the order was passed without application of mind.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Vitthal Budho Tayade, was employed as a District Youth Coordinator in the Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan at Thane, Maharashtra. He was ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession as Barred by Limitation in Property Dispute Between Mother and Son. Court holds that Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies, and limitation runs from the date of knowledge of the defendant's adverse claim, not from the date of refusal to vacate.

22 Feb 2017

The plaintiff, Chetan Navnitlal Shah, filed a suit against his mother, Fizza Navnitlal Shah, seeking a declaration that he was the sole owner of a fla...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Floater Policy Interpretation and Burden of Proof Upheld. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that the policy was not a floater policy and that the insured failed to prove loss was not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Nov 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd., obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy from the respondent, National Insurance Company Ltd...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)