Search Results for "unidentified accused"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder on Railway Platform and Evaluates Eyewitness and Forensic Evidence. Appeal Challenges Reliability of Test Identification Parade and Eyewitness Testimony in Section 302 IPC Conviction.

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Common Intention. Conviction Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, and Omissions in FIR and Innocent Early Statements Discredited the Case.

The case arose from the murder of Uday, a 24‑year‑old son of PW1 Ram Choudhary, a prominent BJP politician and former Mayor of Mudkhed Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrinivas @ Shenu Shirsappa Ayyappa Swami and Vyankatesh @ Vyankati Narsimallu Sagar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Filed by Accused Convicted for Murder and Robbery; Outcome Not Ascertainable from Extract. Appeal Challenged Life Sentence Imposed Under Sections 302 and 394 Read with Section 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Involving Mobile Phone Tracking and Recoveries.

The present criminal appeal was filed by Accused No.3, Gopinath Vitthal Sable, challenging his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...