Search Results for "unfair termination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "unfair termination"

449 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 449 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Employees in Industrial Dispute Against Electricity Company — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. The Court held that the Industrial Court's order of reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages was justified as the termination of the employees was illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice.

10 Nov 2017

The case involves an appeal by employees against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had set aside the order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

4 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that keeping workmen as temporaries for years constituted an unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

16 Mar 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Century Rayon (a division of Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.) challenging an order of the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Orders in Newspaper Employee Reinstatement Cases — Held that Workmen are Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages for Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Sep 2018

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Lokmat Media Private Limited (formerly Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited) challenging orders ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Superannuation Dispute. Employee Entitled to Continue Till Age 60 as Per Certified Standing Orders Under Section 28 and Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Bhandara, which allowed a complaint filed by th...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)