Search Results for "unauthorized filing"

962 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 962 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016

The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Deprecates Malegaon Municipal Corporation for Dereliction of Duty in Removing Unauthorized Constructions. Purchase Notice under Section 127 MRTP Act Not Adjudicated Due to Pending Inter Se Disputes.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by ten individuals claiming ownership of plot bearing survey number 110/B in Malega...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against BPCL Officials—Lack of Offence Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and LPG Distribution Order, 2000

Absence of Statutory Violation—No Offence Attracted Under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955—Unauthorized Raid by Vigilance Squad Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Deputy Commissioner's Order Rejecting Regularization of Unauthorized Occupation. Petitioner failed to discharge burden of proving possession prior to cut-off date under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Shri B. Laxmikhanth Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Filed as Public Interest Litigation for Abuse of Process. Exemplary Costs of Rs.1,40,000/- Imposed on Petitioners for Suppressing Material Facts and Pursuing Private Vengeance under Guise of PIL.

The petitioners, fourteen residents of P.Dasapura village, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Affidavit-in-Reply to Notice of Motion Cannot Be Treated as Written Statement.

The appellant, M/s. B. Jayantilal, a partnership firm, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under S...