Search Results for "tripartite development agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "tripartite development agreement"

160 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Section 9 Order Directing Handover of Redeveloped Flat and Transit Benefits to Occupant in Possession. Court Reiterates Principle that Redevelopment Cannot Be Used to Evict Occupant and that the Person Dishoused Must Receive Transit Rent and Be Put Back in Possession of New Flat Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Jun 2025

The dispute centered on Flat No. 12 in Spectrum building, Khar, Mumbai, which was undergoing redevelopment. The flat was occupied by Leena, wife of Ro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Developer's Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 11 Arbitration Application Over Tripartite Loan Agreements. Loan Agreement's Mumbai Seat Cannot Be Imported into Tripartite Agreements That Neither Specify Seat Nor Bind Developer to Mumbai Jurisdiction.

8 Jul 2025

The dispute arose from two Tripartite Agreements dated November 2, 2016, executed among Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited as lender, M/s. Rise Proj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Vacate Interim Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute. Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Not Shown to Be Lacking Due to Defendant's Own Conduct Under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC.

27 Mar 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed an application filed by defendant No.1A (Vivek Madhavlal Pittie) seeking vacation of an interim injunction granted on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Cancelled Development Agreement — Agreement Cancelled Prior to Adjudication Not Liable to Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that stamp duty is chargeable on instruments, not on transactions, and a cancelled instrument cannot be subjected to duty.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Vikrant Vikas Raikar, proprietor of M/s. Elegant Constructions, challenged an order dated 16th March 2018 passed by the Chief Controll...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute — Arbitration Clause Not Invoked Before Filing Petition. Court Holds That Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Requires Prior Invocation of Arbitration or Demonstrated Intention to Arbitrate.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Sarthak Developers, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Irrevocable Consents by Occupants Upheld. Court holds that once occupants have given unconditional irrevocable consents for redevelopment, they cannot subsequently withdraw or revoke them, and the High Power Committee's approval based on such consents is valid.

14 Jun 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the proposed redevelopment of a plot of land admeasuring 3297.68...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Housing Board's Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Liability for Mental Harassment and Litigation Costs Apportioned 70:30 Between Developer and Housing Board; Interest Rate Reduced to 9% p.a. The Court held that Clause 9(c) of the Tripartite Agreement does not cover mental harassment or litigation costs, and the interest rate should remain at 9% p.a. as per the agreement and earlier orders.

17 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by Respondent No. 2 (a flat buyer) against M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Developer) and Cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order in MIDC Effluent Treatment Plant Dispute — Appellant Not Liable for CETP Charges After Disconnection. Tripartite Agreement for Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) terminated upon appellant's disconnection; respondent cannot recover charges for period after disconnection under the agreement and Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961.

5 Jun 2023

The appellant, M/s Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing synthetic filament...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)