Search Results for "trade mark assignment"

57 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving Beer Labels. Plaintiff's mark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be infringed by defendant's use of '5000' in similar label, as numeral is an essential feature not descriptive of beer strength.

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Som Distilleries & Breweries Li...