Search Results for "time-barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "time-barred"

75 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Govt. of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Deemed Not Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1983, Compensation Not Tendered, but Twin Conditions of Possession and Compensation Must Both Be Unsatisfied for Lapse.

15 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the Delhi High Court's judgment dated 01.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No.27 of 2015, which declared th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Collector in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overruled Precedent Leads to Reversal. Possession Taken in 2004 Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Land Acquisition Collector (South East), Delhi Government, against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 25.04...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside. Compensation Non-Payment Does Not Automatically Trigger Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Service Matter Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches — Respondent's Claim for Reinstatement After 33 Years Rejected as Stale and Barred by Limitation. The Court held that repeated representations do not revive a stale cause of action and that the respondent abandoned her employment by not asserting her rights within a reasonable time.

7 Dec 2022

The State of Uttar Pradesh and its education authorities appealed against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) which declared that t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. The Court Held That Deemed Lapse Requires Both Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation, Overruling Prior Precedent and Excluding Stay Periods, Thereby Reversing High Court's Declaration of Lapse.

29 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the H...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The acquisition was declared lapsed due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession, despite pending proceedings under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

22 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from land acquisitions by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Bangalore, for establishing a mega market, involving multipl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Feb 2022

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiffs in Property Declaration Suit Due to Omission of Possession Relief. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Plaintiff, Not in Possession, Failed to Seek Further Relief of Possession.

25 Nov 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed in 1987 by Arakeri Abbaiah, the original plaintiff, seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)