Search Results for "third party purchaser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "third party purchaser"

1197 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1197 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

9 Jun 2022

The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.

6 Apr 2005

The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Property Dispute — Interim Injunction Restored Pending Suit. The court held that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by reversing the trial court's grant of interim injunction without finding perversity, and restored the status quo ante.

14 Aug 2020

The petitioners, Vishnu Anant Dessai and his wife, filed a suit in 2015 seeking declaration that a sale deed executed in 2014 by the vendor (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property — Purchaser Failed to Demonstrate Willingness to Complete Transaction. Readiness without willingness is insufficient for specific performance under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff insisted on adjustment of loans without calling upon defendant to pay its share.

8 Apr 2019

The suit was filed by G Ram Construction Company (plaintiff) against Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt Ltd (defendant) for specific performance of an agre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Purchaser's Challenge to SARFAESI Action; Sale During Injunction Void. Sale of Mortgaged Property During Pendency of Injunction Order Held Void; Purchaser Has No Right to Question Prior Equitable Mortgage Under Section 58(f) of Transfer of Property Act.

10 Mar 2017

The writ petition challenged the orders of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) and the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dismissing the petitione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

1 Dec 2016

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against DRAT Order Setting Aside Sale Under RDDBFI Act. Petitioner Challenges Order Directing Refund of Bid Amount, Alleging Fraudulent Agreement to Defeat Auction Sale.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Smt. K. Padma, auction purchaser of a property in a bank recovery sale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)