Search Results for "terrorizing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "terrorizing"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

10 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Ex-Chief Minister and MLA in Prison Assault Case Due to Bar Under Prisons Act, 1894. Alleged Offences Committed Inside Notified Temporary Prison Must Be Dealt With Under Special Statute, Not General Criminal Law.

10 May 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by accused No. 1 (an ex-Chief Minister)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and bail status, vitiating the preventive detention order.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Firoz @ Babali Makbul Khan, challenged the detention order dated 6th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Imminent Possibility of Release on Bail. Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Cogent Material or Satisfaction That Detenu in Custody Would Be Released on Bail.

27 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Nitin Baban Pawar, challenged an order of detention dated 19th May 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under the Maharas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder and Arms Act Case, Upholding Conviction Based on Cogent Eye-Witness Testimony and Explained Delay in Statements. Court Held That Delay in Recording Witness Statements Under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC Is Not Fatal When Caused by Fear or Intimidation from Accused, and Recovery of Weapons and Ballistic Evidence Supports Prosecution Case Under Sections 302/120B IPC and Section 27(3) Arms Act.

7 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with four consolidated criminal appeals filed by multiple appellants challenging their conviction and sentence for of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Renders Detention Unreasonable. Court held that the Detaining Authority must consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic measures like cancellation of bail or prosecution before ordering preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981.

27 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Rakesh Mohan Gadekar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and In-camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid

21 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Shamim Makmood Khan, mother of detenu Firoj @ Babbali Maqbul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 16 October 2019 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Violation of Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. Non-supply of bail application and bail order in a pending crime vitiated the detention order as it deprived the detenu of an effective opportunity to make representation.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sayed Jafar Sayed Nasir, challenged two detention orders dated 20th February 2018 and 12th March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Po...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. The court held that mere criminal antecedents without evidence of public disturbance do not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

20 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Nikki @ Kawa s/o Suresh Khare, challenged an order of detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City on 29 January 2018 u...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)