Search Results for "tenancy right"

1723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Subletting and Non-Payment of Rent Established. The Court held that the tenant's failure to pay rent and unauthorized subletting justified eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, landlords of a premises in Pune, filed a writ petition challenging the appellate judgment that reversed the trial court's eviction or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Tenant's Claim for Restoration and Price Fixation Under Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948. Protected Tenancy Status Crystalized on Tiller's Day; Landlord's Subsequent Possession Recovery Held Void as Proceeding Was Without Legal Sanctity.

The dispute pertained to agricultural land in village Asoda, Jalgaon, originally owned by Subba Girdhar Jagtap and leased to Sampat Ramu Narkhede arou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Revision in Eviction Suit Against Trespassers Claiming Tenancy Inheritance. Tenancy ceases on death of tenant; respondents not legal heirs under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the landlords (petitioners) against the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court in Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Respondent's Sole Entitlement to Suit Premises. Court Holds That Rent Receipts Are Best Evidence of Tenancy and Appellants Failed to Prove Joint Tenancy.

The case involves a dispute over tenancy rights in a suit premises consisting of four rooms on the second floor of a building known as 'Haroon Manzil'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Landlord Proved Subletting as Tenants Had No Control Over Suit Shop and Sub-Tenants Were in Exclusive Possession Under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) of M.R.C. Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against the judgments and decrees of eviction passed by t...