Search Results for "substantive appointment"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Teachers in University Appointment Validity Dispute - Appointments Made Under Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 Remain Valid Despite University's Conversion to Central University Under Central Universities Act, 2009.

The dispute involved teachers appointed as Associate Professors/Assistant Professors in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at H.N.B. Garhwal Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Ad-hoc Lecturer to Continue Until Regular Appointment in UP Education Service Case. Ad-hoc appointment in leave vacancy does not confer right to substantive post; salary directed under Article 142 for work done.

The appellant, Raman Singh, was appointed as an ad-hoc Lecturer in English on 11 August 1993 by the Committee of Management of the third respondent sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers Appointed Prior to Service Rules. Selection Process Indicates Regular Appointment, Not Deputation, Under UP Minority Welfare Department Gazetted Officers Service Rules 2001.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Raja Singh and others against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, which had dismissed their writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal Against Mandamus to Fill Vacancies from Expired Rank List. Mere Empanelment Does Not Confer Indefeasible Right to Appointment; Financial Constraints Are Valid Grounds for Not Filling Vacancies.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation against a High Court order directing appointments against 97 vacancie...