Search Results for "stolen property"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft by Clerk Under Section 381 IPC. Discovery of Stolen Property Under Section 27 Evidence Act Sufficient for Conviction in Absence of Direct Evidence.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Sunil Madhukar Morwal against his conviction under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for theft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Applicant in Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge or Reason to Believe Property Was Stolen. Conviction Under Section 411 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shri Gotilal Dalchand Jain challenging his conviction under Section 411 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Bombay Police Act for Possession of Stolen Property — Recovery Based on Co-accused's Disclosure Statement Not Admissible Against Petitioner Under Section 27 of Evidence Act.

The petitioner, Satish Shivajirao Deshmukh, a jeweller, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nanded, under Section 411 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as sole testimony of complainant was not corroborated by independent witnesses and recovery of stolen property was doubtful.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Mohan @ Mouneshi, against the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Railway Property Case for Lack of Proof of Railway Ownership. Essential ingredient of unlawful possession of railway property not established as prosecution failed to prove that seized scrap belonged to railways.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate, F.C. (Rly.), Manmad, in Regular Criminal Case No. 56 of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery and Wrongful Restraint in Jewellery Shop Robbery Case. Victim's Identification and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 392 and 341 IPC.

The appellant, Arshadali Shaikh Usmanali Shaikh, was convicted by the 4th AdHoc Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai, for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as sole identification by injured witness was not credible and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an incident of dacoity that occurred on 3 November 2008 when Madhukar Palankar, the father of the informant Shailesh Palankar, wa...