Search Results for "stagnation"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Scale Parity Dispute for Naval Civilian Officers. Judicial Review Limited as Pay Fixation is Primarily an Executive Function Best Left to Expert Bodies Like Pay Commissions, Unless Grave Error is Shown.

The dispute originated from the Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association's challenge before the Central Administrative Tribunal against the Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Career Progression Schemes. Employees Governed by Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, 2009 Retrospectively as Eligibility Under Assured Career Progression Scheme, 1999 Does Not Create Vested Right.

The dispute arose between the Union of India and its employees regarding the applicable career progression scheme. The employees, working as Junior En...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Pay Scale Dispute Under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that office orders introducing a stagnation scheme did not require gazette notification under Section 79, as the Board had authority under existing regulations to fix pay scales.

The appeal arose from a dispute over pay scales for Junior Engineers (Civil) employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB). To address stagnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...