Search Results for "sports participation"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Candidate with Higher Marks in Sports Quota Recruitment. Selection based on merit and marks obtained in selection process upheld as per Maharashtra Sports Policy.

The petitioner, Sushant Ulhasrao Kawade, filed a writ petition challenging the selection of respondent no.3, Sandip Sambhaji Yadav, for the post of Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Candidate with Higher Sports Qualification in Police Recruitment. Court holds that selection criteria based on higher qualification in sports is permissible and does not violate equality.

The petitioner, Sushant Ulhasrao Kawade, filed a writ petition challenging the selection of respondent no.3, Sandip Sambhaji Yadav, for the post of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of S. Nithya Judgments to Cricket Associations in Membership and Election Dispute. Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association Appeals Against Madras High Court's Application of Athletics Governance Reforms to Cricket Association

The Supreme Court heard appeals from the Appellant against the Madras High Court's judgment that applied directions from S. Nithya cases to the cricke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005

The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...