Search Results for "sewage treatment plant"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Criminal Revision Application Against Conviction Under Sections 44, 25, 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. Conviction Challenged by Accused Nos.3 and 4 was Upheld by Sessions Court, and Revision Filed in High Court.

The revision application was filed by the applicants, who were original accused nos.3 and 4, challenging the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Resident Welfare Association's Writ Seeking Alternate Sewage Treatment Plant Location. Public Interest Overrides Individual Objections; Mandamus Not Issued for Administrative Decisions on Public Projects Under Article 226.

The petitioner, M/s Nagammal Street Resident Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a manda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Disposes of Writ Appeal on Consent of Parties for Shifting of Sewage Treatment Plant. Directions Issued to Obtain Necessary Consents and Complete Works Within Four Months in Accordance with Layout Approval.

The appellant, a developer/builder (M/s Marutham Galaxy), filed a writ appeal against the order of a single judge in a writ petition that directed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Restraint on Construction of Underground Sewerage Pumping Station in Residential Area. Public Health and Sanitation Needs Outweigh Individual Objections When Adequate Safeguards Are Provided.

The petitioner, D. Varadaraj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Quashing of Prosecution of Municipal Commissioners Under Water Pollution Act. Holds That Commissioner of City Municipal Council and Chief Officers Are 'Head of Department' Under Section 48 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

The Karnataka State Pollution Control Board filed complaints against the City Municipal Council, Krishnarajapuram, Bangalore, and its Commissioner (B....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MPCB Appeal in Water Pollution Case Against Deepak Fertilisers. Acquittal Set Aside Due to Procedural Lapses and Non-Compliance with Consent Conditions Under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

The Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Part on Mutuality Principle for Effluent Treatment Association. Interest on Bank Deposits Held Taxable as Income from Investments, Not Covered by Mutuality.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for ...