Search Results for "settlement commission"

1085 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1085 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility Condition for Settlement Commission Applications Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that a press release and notification imposing a cut-off date for eligibility to file settlement applications were ultra vires the Act.

The petitioner, a company engaged in sugar and ethanol business, was subjected to a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 25.07.2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Bogus Purchases Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Settlement Commission's Discretion to Accept Additional Income Disclosure Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 21 September 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Orders in Customs Duty Under-Invoicing Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s Paul Industries, imported electronic goods during 1995-96 and was issued a show cause notice on 11th June 1999 by the Directorate ...