Search Results for "seniority rules"

Trending :

Search Results for "seniority rules"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruit District Judges' Challenge to Seniority Determination in Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services. Seniority Based on Date of Appointment Upheld, with 2017 Rules Applied Prospectively Under Rule 11, Denying Retrospective Roster-Based Seniority as Sought by Petitioners.

12 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from two writ petitions filed by directly recruited District Judges in the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services, challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Servicemen's Appeal in Seniority Fixation Case Under Punjab Civil Service Rules. Appellants Not Entitled to Military Service Benefits Under Repealed 1972 Rules as Appointment Made Under 1982 Rules After Advertisement Issued Post-Enforcement.

26 Mar 2021

The dispute involved ex-servicemen appellants who were appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) in 1986 after being released from the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Departmental Promotees — Rules That Date of Selection, Not Appointment, Determines Seniority Under Rule 27 of Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Services Rules, 1975. The Court found that the department deliberately accelerated the DP recruitment process to give them an unfair advantage, which was mala fide and impermissible.

24 Jan 2020

The case involved a dispute over seniority between direct recruits (DRs) and departmental promotees (DPs) for the post of Tax Assistants in the Rajast...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

2 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)