Search Results for "security deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "security deposit"

1204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1204 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal Against Contribution Order in IBC Liquidation — Secured Creditor Realizing Security Under Section 52 Not Liable to Contribute to Workmen's Dues or Liquidation Costs. The court held that the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 IBC does not apply to secured creditors who opt out of the liquidation process, and Section 226(1)(b) of Companies Act, 2013 is inapplicable.

14 Jan 2025

The appeal was filed by Cosmos Co-Operative Bank Ltd., a secured creditor of Pandit Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), challenging an order of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.

27 Jun 2024

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in MPID Act Case — Intercorporate Deposits Not Covered Under MPID Act. Loan advanced by one company to another company registered under Companies Act, 1956 does not constitute a 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Ashish Mahendrakar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiffs in Leave and License Dispute — Defendant's Unconditional Appearance Precludes Leave to Defend. The Court held that the Defendant failed to raise any triable issues and was not entitled to leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

9 Dec 2014

The Plaintiffs, M/s. Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a Summary Suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

6 Sep 2005

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunkers Supply — Holds That Bunkers Are Necessaries and Arrest Valid Under Admiralty Jurisdiction. The court upheld the arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace for a claim for bunkers supplied as necessaries, affirming the High Court's inherent admiralty jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an admiralty suit filed by Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, against the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, a Panamanian-flag vesse...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)