Search Results for "section 364A IPC"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Kidnapping Case Based on Recovery of Abductee and Circumstantial Evidence. Life Sentence Under Sections 364A/368 IPC Confirmed as Testimony of Child Victim and Recovery of Clothes and Toys Corroborate Prosecution Case.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which dismissed the criminal appeals of Harjindra Singh and Dilbag Singh @ Mitthu, uphol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal of Convicted Person Against Conviction under Sections 364A and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Appeal Challenges Life Imprisonment and Rigorous Imprisonment for Kidnapping for Ransom and Extortion.

The appeal was filed by the appellant Javed Akhtar Basiulla Ansari against his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane in Sessions Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case — Life Imprisonment Upheld. Evidence of Demand for Ransom and Recovery of Victim at Accused's Instance Establishes Offence Under Section 364(A) IPC.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 363 and 364(A) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition Challenging Non-Taking of Cognizance for Serious Offences in Private Complaint Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Mind to Complaint and Consider Cognizance of All Offences Disclosed

The petitioner, Nagaraja Rao C.H., filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom Under Section 364A, 34 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused Based on Test Identification, Handwriting, and Call Records, Sentencing Them to Life Imprisonment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard Criminal Appeal Nos. 147 of 2006 and 134 of 2006, along with Criminal Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Ransom Demand Under Sections 363, 364A, 120B IPC — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Abducting Minor Son of Factory Owner and Demanding Rs. 1 Lakh Ransom.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammed Mosin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 363, 364A r...