Search Results for "section 33B"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Applicability of Biological Diversity Rules to Indian Entities. Rule 17 of Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 and Benefit Sharing Regulations Apply to All Entities, Not Just Foreign Entities.

The petitioners, comprising an association of Ayurvedic drug manufacturers and individual companies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. MRT's Reversal of Collector's Order Set Aside for Ignoring Binding Supreme Court Order and Limitation Under Section 33B of Bombay Tenancy Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated November 30, 2023. The MRT had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition and Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Landlord's bonafide need for personal cultivation under Section 33B and default in rent under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from agricultural tenancy disputes over the same suit property. The landlord, Tukaram Maruti Dubal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, who are the heirs of the original tenant Kondiba Dnyanu Dongale, and the respondents, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Set Off of Unabsorbed Business Loss Against Profits of Erstwhile 10A Unit. Tribunal's Order Allowing Set Off of Brought Forward Loss of Assessment Year 2002-03 Against Profits of 10A Unit in Assessment Year 2005-06 Upheld.

The case involves two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...