Search Results for "section 304-A"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against BESCOM Engineers in Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires proof of gross negligence directly causing death, not mere failure of duty.

The petitioners, Sri Sreeramu V. and Subramanya T., who are Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer respectively at BESCOM's Whitefield Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Discharges Accused in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case for Culpable Homicide. Non-Provision of Safety Equipment Does Not Attract Section 304 Part II IPC Without Knowledge or Intent.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Yuvraj Laxmilal Kanther and Nimesh Pravinchandra Shah against the judgment of the Bombay High Court whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Gross Negligence. Death During Surgery Not Sufficient for Criminal Liability Under Section 304A IPC Without Proof of Recklessness.

The case arises from the death of Prakash Parekh, a young man who underwent a surgical procedure performed by Dr. Anil Pinto on 20/02/1984. The compla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death in Motor Accident Case. Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present appeal was filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. by the original accused No.1, Sanjay Bhavrao @ Baburao Sapkal, challenging his conviction in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Discharge in Rash Driving Case. Court holds that prima facie case exists against accused for offences under Sections 279 and 304 of IPC and Sections 5, 180, 14, 106, 190, 115 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The judgment pertains to two criminal revision petitions filed by accused persons challenging the order dated 30.06.2016 passed by the LXIX Additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established Against the Applicants.

The judgment concerns three bail applications filed by accused persons arrested in connection with the collapse of an illegally constructed building i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

42539

...