Search Results for "section 149(2)"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Secondary Evidence and Power of Attorney in Property Transactions: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 65 Evidence Act and Section 100 CPC i

n Tharammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan, the dispute arose from the sale of immovable property executed by the defendant acting as an alleged agen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Retired District Judge as Sole Arbitrator Granted Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Notice.

The petitioner, M/s Bafna Udyog, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Money Recovery Decree, Upholds Use of Photocopy Agreement as Secondary Evidence. Where Defendant Took Original Agreement to Procure Signatures and Did Not Return It, Photocopy Held Admissible Under Section 65, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from a suit for recovery of money decreed by the trial court. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants, representing themselves as o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decree Granting Letters of Administration in Will Dispute. Will Proved in Accordance with Law, No Suspicious Circumstances Found Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a dispute over the estate of E. Srinivasa Pillai, who died on 19th January 1978. The plaintiffs, C. Saradambal (widow of the testato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Sale Deed Cancellation Suit Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Undue Influence or Fraud Under Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The appellant, Shivakumar, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.2108/2006 before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, seeking cancel...