Search Results for "second preference votes"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Challenging Interim Status Quo Order in College Correspondent Appointment Dispute. Church Constitution Provisions Prima Facie Support Bishop's Action to Stay Appointment and Assume Charge.

The appellant, S. Byju Nizeth Paaul, filed a writ appeal against an interim order dated 23.10.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.(MD) No.179...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holds Managing Agents' Group Controlling Over 75% Voting Power Excludes Company from 'Public Interest' Under Section 23A. Partners of Managing Agency Forming a Controlling Group Cannot Be Counted as Public for Purposes of Exemption Under Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the applicability of Section 23A to a company where the Income-tax Officer sought ...