Search Results for "sales promotion employees"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reversion Order for Failure to Pass Departmental Examination. Reversion of Sales Tax Officer Upheld as All Chances Under Examination Rules Exhausted.

The petitioner, Shri Prakash Poonaji Bhatkar, a Sales Tax Officer, was promoted to Class II post and was required to pass a departmental examination w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Forest Guards in Promotion Dispute — Circular Revocation Invalid Without Proper Rescission. State Government's Order Dated 14.05.2009 Did Not Revoke Earlier Circular of 17.10.1977; Subsequent Revocation Order Dated 11.06.2012 Was Not Given Retrospective Effect.

The case involves two appeals by Forest Guards, Omkar Sinha and another, against the State of Chhattisgarh and others, concerning their entitlement to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order Against Employee in National Textile Corporation — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. Order Set Aside as Corporation Failed to Consider Employee's Representation and Did Not Follow Its Own Premature Retirement Scheme.

The petitioner, Vasant Lalchand Shah, joined the National Textile Corporation (NTC) in December 1978 as a Weaving Master. He had prior experience of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.

The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Workman Status of General Manager (Research) in Industrial Disputes Act Case. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the employee, not the designation, determines workman status, and the respondent's work was primarily technical and clerical.

The petitioner, M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research & Development Centre, a nonprofit scientific research organization, challenged an order of the Ind...