Search Results for "royalty demand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "royalty demand"

100 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in TDS Dispute on Internet Charges Paid to Non-Resident — Payments for Telecom Connectivity Not Royalty or Fees for Technical Services. Section 40(a)(i) Disallowance Set Aside as Payments Were Not Chargeable to Tax Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

30 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited, is engaged in the development and export of computer software. For the asses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Copyright Injunction Against Music Streaming Service in Interpretation of Section 31D of Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that a statutory license under Section 31D for radio broadcasting does not extend to internet streaming services like Wynk Music.

20 Oct 2022

The case involves two appeals by Wynk Ltd and Bharti Airtel Ltd (defendants) against an order of the Bombay High Court (SJ Kathawalla J) dated 23rd Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tahsildar's Orders for Vehicle Seizure and Demand of Royalty for Sand Transportation Beyond Permit Time. Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Impose Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Violation of Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1963.

17 Oct 2022

The petitioners, owners of vehicles transporting sand, challenged show cause notices and final orders passed by the Tahsildar demanding payment of roy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Condition Levying Royalty on Excavation of Earth for Reservoir Construction — Excavation of ordinary earth for construction of earthen dyke within leased land does not constitute 'mining' under MMDR Act, 1957.

4 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, is an integrated steel plant that was allotted 629.92 acres of land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Demand for Royalty on Earth Excavated for Plot Development — Notification Exempting Royalty on Earth Used for Same Plot Development Applies Retrospectively. The court held that the exemption notification dated 5 May 2015 under the Maharashtra Minor Minerals Extraction (Development and Regulation Rules) 2013 applies retrospectively, and the order demanding royalty without hearing violates natural justice.

16 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Agile Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate development company, owned lands at revenue village Balkum in Thane district, includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)