Search Results for "right to cross-examine"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "right to cross-examine"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Denial of Cross-Examination Right. Conviction under Sections 448 and 376 IPC r/w Section 5(j)(ii) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as accused was not given opportunity to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, violating principles of natural justice.

23 Dec 2020

The appellant, Govindaraju @ Kutti, was convicted by the LIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in Special CC No.527/2016 for offen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Lokayukta Inquiry Matter — Petitioner's Right to Hearing Upheld. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Submit Documents Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

10 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vijay Kumar G. Sulakhe, a Commissioner of Gadag-Betgeri Urban Development Authority, filed three writ petitions challenging orders of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSFC's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Recall Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Holds That Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right and Denial Thereof Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC.

5 Mar 2015

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 2.12.2013 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Ju...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition for Cross-Examination Rights in Civil Suit — Order of Cross-Examination Must Be Availed by Parties Before Evidence is Closed. The court set aside the trial court's order restricting cross-examination, relying on Bhujang Nathuji Daf v. Ramkrishna Daulat Daf, 2009(1) Mh.L.J. 683, and granted liberty to cross-examine subject to costs.

26 Aug 2013

The petitioners, Smt. Pritabai Suryakant Shetgaonkar and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition to Recall Complainant for Cross-Examination in Cheque Dishonour Case. Magistrate's Rejection of Section 311 CrPC Application Set Aside as Failure to Exercise Jurisdiction.

23 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Shankar s/o Nathuji Khandare, was the original accused in S.C.C. No. 5305/2009 filed by respondent no.2, APT Packaging Limited, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Subsequently Added Defendants Seeking Cross-Examination of Plaintiff in Civil Suit. Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right Not Lost by Delayed Joinder Under Order 18 Rule 17A of CPC.

13 Jul 2011

The petitioners were subsequently added as party defendants in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007 on 14/9/2010. After being added, they filed their writ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Essential Commodities Act Case — License Cancellation Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Licensee Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses, Rendering Inquiry Void.

8 Feb 2010

The case pertains to an appeal against the cancellation of a fair price shop license under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The appellant, Rampras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Cross-Examine Witness in Children's Court Case — Order Closing Cross-Examination Set Aside for Denial of Fair Opportunity. The court held that even if the ground for seeking time was not tenable, the trial court should have granted a last opportunity for cross-examination in the interest of justice.

5 Jan 2010

The petitioner, an accused in Special Case No. 46/2008 before the Children's Court at Porvorim, Goa, challenged the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-Summoning of Panch Witness for Cross-Examination in Criminal Trial — Right to Cross-Examine Not Extinguished by Witness Absence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine a prosecution witness cannot be denied due to the witness's absence, and directed fresh summons to be issued.

12 Apr 2005

The applicants (accused) filed a criminal application challenging the trial court's order rejecting their application to issue summons to a prosecutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Additional Statements at Pre-Charge Stage. Production of Additional Statements Under Section 173(8) CrPC Without Notice to Accused and Without Opportunity to Cross-Examine Violates Fair Trial Rights.

10 Feb 2005

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No.644 of 1996, challenged an order dated 16th October 2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)