Search Results for "revised gratuity scheme"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Award Linking Wages to Cost of Living Index. Award Linking Wage Scales to Cost of Living and Reducing Gratuity Qualifying Period Upheld as Consistent with Minimum Wage Principles.

The case concerned an industrial dispute between Hydro (Engineers) Pvt. Ltd. and its workmen over revision of wage scales and gratuity schemes. Previo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Institution to Implement Grievance Committee Decision for Retired Employee's Pensionary Benefits. Institution Must Forward Proposal for Monetary Benefits Within Four Weeks.

The petitioner, a retired employee of Respondent No. 7 institution (Milind College of Science, Aurangabad), sought enforcement of a decision passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds RBI Circular Denying Arrears of Pension from Date of Retirement in Pension Option Case. Prospective Pension from July 1, 2020, Upheld as Valid Exercise of Employer's Discretion.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) appealed against a Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court that had dismissed its appeal against a Single Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Work Charged Employees on Pension Calculation Under 2013 Rules. Rule 5(v) of Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditions (Repealing) Rules, 2013 Limits Counting of Work Charged Service to Shortfall in Qualifying Period for Pension, Not Entire Service Period.

The dispute arose from appeals by work charged employees whose services were regularized under the Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity. Recovery of Rs.1,39,316/- Set Aside as Payment Was Due to Departmental Error Without Misrepresentation by Employee.

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily retired...