Search Results for "retrospective pay scale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "retrospective pay scale"

256 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Pay Scale Revision Case — Benefit Not Retrospective for Retired Employee. The Court held that the date of implementation of revised pay scale (01.04.2001) was fixed on a rational basis and cannot be antedated to 01.01.1996 for an employee who retired before that date.

14 Feb 2020

The State of Uttar Pradesh and others appealed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 01.11.2017, which allowed the wr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows U.P.S.R.T.C. Appeal in Driver Superannuation Age Dispute — Age of Retirement Held as 58 Years for Drivers Placed in Group C After Pay Revision. The Court held that once the pay scale of drivers was revised to Rs.335 and above, they fell under Group C and their retirement age was 58 years under Regulation 37 of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Other than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981.

16 Apr 2019

The case involves appeals by the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation against a common judgment of the Allahabad High Court which confirmed Labour Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Pay Parity for Section Officers in High Court Administration with Mantralaya Staff. The court upheld the principle of parity of pay scales between High Court staff and State Government staff based on a 1965 agreement.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra F. Rupwate, a Section Officer (Class II) in the office of the Registrar General of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition for Full Back Wages and Dismisses Management's Challenge to Reinstatement in Education Service Dispute. Termination of Assistant Teacher Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act Held Illegal, Entitling Her to Reinstatement with Continuity and Full Back Wages.

5 Aug 2016

The judgment involves two interconnected writ petitions: one filed by the Management (Samaj Shikshan Mandal and Tanaji Daulatrao Patil Vidyalaya) chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Challenge to Employee's Appointment and Allows Employee's Petition for Salary Fixation in Education Service Dispute. Appointment of Assistant Teacher by Management without prior approval of Education Officer held invalid under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, but employee entitled to salary from date of appointment due to management's fault.

5 Aug 2016

The judgment involves two interconnected writ petitions: one by the Management (Samaj Shikshan Mandal and Tanaji Daulatrao Patil Vidyalaya) challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teachers Seeking Pension Revision Based on 6th Pay Commission. Held that Hakim Committee Recommendations Not Applicable to Teaching Staff and Pre-2006 Retirees Not Entitled to Revised Pension.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, an association of superannuated teachers, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the recommendations of the Hakim committee ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree is Valid and Not Unconstitutional. The court held that the Explanation defining partition as only by registered deed or court decree is within legislative competence and does not violate fundamental rights.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree Held Valid. The Explanation defining 'partition' as only by registered deed or court decree is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 15, or 21 of the Constitution.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased original petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Administrator of Dadra & Nagar Haveli Challenging CAT Orders on Regularisation of Surveyors and Stockmen. Court upholds CAT's direction to consider regularisation of ad hoc employees who completed 10 years of service, applying the principle of legitimate expectation and equality.

6 Oct 2006

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Administrator of the Union Territory of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and the Union of India challenging orde...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)