Search Results for "reopening notice"

598 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 598 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening and Agricultural Income Estimation Case. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid for lack of tangible material, and Tribunal's reversal of CIT(A)'s agricultural income estimation set aside as perverse.

The appellant, Shri S L Basavaraj (HUF), an assessee, filed appeals against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion and Audit Objection Held Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Lalitha Chem Industries Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing chemicals with units at Tarapur and Silvasa. For A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...