Search Results for "religious insult"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against TV Show Participants in Religious Sentiment Case. Alleged Offence Under Section 295-A IPC Not Made Out as Acts Did Not Deliberately and Maliciously Intend to Outrage Religious Feelings.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging the registration of FIR No. 265 of 2010 under Section 295-A read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against TV Channel Officials in Marathi Serial Dialogue Case. Words 'Mhara Poranchi' Held Not to Insult Religious Sentiments or Intentionally Harm Scheduled Caste Community Under Section 295A IPC, Section 7(g) PCR Act, and Section 3 Atrocities Act.

The petitioners, including the Programming Head of a Marathi channel and the channel company itself, sought quashing of FIR No. 232 of 2023 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Unlawful Assembly Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Communal Harmony. Sections 143, 147, 148, 153A, 504, 506, 149 IPC Not Attracted as Incident Was a Spontaneous Altercation Without Common Object or Communal Motive.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Chief Officer in Idol Dumping Case — No Intent to Insult Religion Found. Section 295 IPC requires deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, which was absent as the applicant acted in discharge of official duties.

The applicant, Dhondiba Irba Namwad, was the Chief Officer of Municipal Council, Khamgaon, District Buldhana. He filed a criminal application under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Section 295A IPC Case — Facebook Post Comparing Lord Parshuram with Movie Character Not Deliberate Malicious Act. Court Held That Mere Comparison Without Intent to Outrage Religious Feelings Does Not Attract Section 295A IPC.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.73 of 2016 registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Protection of Civil Rights Act for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Alleged Insulting Words Not Uttered in Public View and No Intentional Insult Established.

The petitioner, Dr. Tapan Prasad Bagchi, the Director of the National Institute of Industrial Engineering Society (NITIE), filed a Criminal Writ Petit...