Search Results for "registered dealer"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Input Tax Credit Based on Annual Audited Accounts in KVAT Act Cases. The court held that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act permits availment of input tax credit based on the annual audited statement in Form VAT 240, irrespective of the claim in returns under Section 35.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by M/s MFAR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Mangalore Force, challenging the interpretation of Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Managing Director and President of Ford India and Car Dealer Directors in Alleged Fraud Case. Sale of Used Car Disguised as New Model Leads to Allegations of Cheating and Forgery, but Court Finds No Involvement of Manufacturer.

The judgment of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dealt with three criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sales Tax Reference by Dealer in Setoff Disallowance Case. Rule 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 restricts setoff to raw materials and consumable stores, not capital assets like scientific equipment used for research and development.

The case is a sales tax reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Gold (Control) Act, 1968 with Partial Striking Down. Court holds delegation of power to Administrator not excessive and applies severability doctrine to sever ultra vires provisions.

The case arose from a constitutional challenge to the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, enacted to curb gold smuggling and control internal gold transactions ...