Search Results for "refund with interest"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "refund with interest"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Under RERA Due to Binding Precedent on Remedies for Delayed Possession. The National Commission's Reliance on Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni & Another Was Upheld, as Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Provides Allottees Unqualified Rights to Refund or Interest for Delay.

28 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Consumer Case No.1043 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.

21 Jan 2022

The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Consumer Dispute, Overturns High Court's Limitation Bar. Stamp Duty Refund Application Not Barred by Six-Month Limitation Under Section 48(3) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Stamp Paper Purchased Bona Fide and Transaction Failed Due to Judicial Order from National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

24 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from the appellant's booking of a residential apartment in Pune in 2014, where he paid stamp duty for an agreement to sell. A d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in GST Case Due to Availability of Statutory Alternative Remedy. High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Under Article 226 of Constitution as No Exceptional Circumstances Like Breach of Fundamental Rights or Violation of Natural Justice Were Established, and Respondent Should Have Availed Remedy Under Section 107 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

3 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a judgment of the High Court of Telangana dated 4 March 2020, which set aside the action of the Assistant Commissioner of State...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

22 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case Involving Land Acquisition. High Court's modification of decree to award compensation under Land Acquisition Act upheld, as specific performance became impossible due to acquisition during suit pendency under Section 21 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

30 Apr 2021

The dispute originated from an agreement to sell executed on 9 March 2010, where the plaintiff paid Rs. 31,50,000 out of a total consideration of Rs. ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)