Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Slum Dwellers Against Eviction for Redevelopment. Non-members of cooperative society lack locus to challenge Slum Rehabilitation Authority's eviction order.

The case involves an appeal filed by four individuals (Ramesh Fakira Lohkare, Arun Baban Kadam, Ramesh Rama Dhakrao, and Suryakant Janardhan Sonawane)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Under DCR 33(10) — Scheme Substantially Implemented, No Interference Warranted. Petitioners Failed to Establish Locus Standi or Eligibility, and the Scheme Had Progressed to Construction Stage.

The case involves a writ petition filed by twenty-one persons claiming to be occupants of a slum known as Meer Hussain Tangewala Chawl on land owned b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...