Search Results for "redevelopment permission"

422 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 422 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of C-1 Building Despite IBC Moratorium — Development Rights Not Asset of Corporate Debtor. Cooperative Housing Society's Right to Redevelop Its Property Upheld Against Resolution Professional's Interference.

The Petitioner, Kher Nagar Sukhsadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned a building on land leased from MHADA. In 2005, it entered into a Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts.

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Redevelopment Permission in CRZ Areas Due to Minimum Plot Size Requirement. Court Upholds MCGM's Decision That Development Control Regulations Do Not Permit Relaxation of Minimum Plot Size for Redevelopment in Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioners, including the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industries and various real estate companies, filed writ petitions challenging the refus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...