Search Results for "redetermination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "redetermination"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Acquiring Body's Challenge to Maintainability of Applications under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Claimants Who Filed Reference under Section 18 Are Not Barred from Seeking Redetermination Under Section 28-A.

6 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, the acquiring body, filed two writ petitions challenging the maintainability of applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for Redetermination of Compensation Under National Highways Act — Limitation Period for Section 3G(5) Application Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award, Not from Notice Under Section 3H.

1 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Bajranglal Vyankatlal Malu and Lalchand Vyankatlal Malu, were owners of lands acquired for the construction of National Highway No.7....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Failed to Pursue Reference Under Section 18 Diligently, Resulting in Dismissal for Non-Payment of Court Fees.

13 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Shri Annasaheb Tulsiram Kharat, owned land at Village Mirgavan, Taluka Karmala, District Solapur, which was acquired for the Sina-Kole...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Section 28A Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 90 Days for Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

2 Apr 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Zainabi, challenged the orders dated 14th May 2010 and 15th June 2012 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 28A Limitation in Land Acquisition Act — Three-Month Period for Redetermination of Compensation Held Constitutional. The court ruled that the three-month limitation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as the classification between award acceptors and Section 18 reference seekers is valid.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Surendrakumar Madhusudan Mor, owned land bearing Gat No.128 admeasuring 5.27 hectares at mouza Pimpri (Hatgaon), Taluka and District Y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales. The court directed reassessment of compensation considering industrial potential and comparable sales.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners from Takalghat, Hingna, Nagpur, challenging the compensation awarded by the Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases — Enhances Compensation for Claimants Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that market value must be determined based on potential use and comparable sales, and that claimants are entitled to additional benefits under Section 23(1A) and 23(2) of the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by claimants whose lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Metro Centre No.1, Panvel, u...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)