Search Results for "reasonable time"

15015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Councillors' Appeals Against Disqualification for Defection Under Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 — Holds That Disqualification Proceedings Must Be Initiated Within Reasonable Time and Delay Amounts to Waiver.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by councillors of various town municipal councils and town panchayats in Belagavi district, Karnataka,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Service Matter — No Willful Disobedience Found as Accused Took Steps for Compliance. Compliance with Court Order Requires Reasonable Time and Administrative Process, Not Instantaneous Action.

The complainants, seven individuals, filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Revisional Order Due to Inordinate Delay in Filing Revision. Revisional Authority Erred in Entertaining Revision After Eight Years Without Considering Reasonable Time Limitation Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, Mahadu Onkar Patil and Manjula Mahadu Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Divis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Revision Under Section 70A of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 Filed After 30 Years Held Not Maintainable. Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Even When No Limitation Is Prescribed.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two appeals arising from a dispute between two trusts named after Mahatma Gandhi. The appellant, Maharashtra Gandhi S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...