Search Results for "reanalysis"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Life Convict in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Machhindra Ukandi Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of his wife Gangasagar under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Prosecution for Alleged Violation of Sections 18(a)(i) and 17B(d) Held Invalid Without Prior Sanction.

The petitioners, including a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, challenged the criminal proceedings initiated against them in Spl.CC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Sexual Assault of Minor Orphan Girl Under POCSO Act and IPC. Court Relies on Testimony of Victim and School Teachers, Holds That Absence of Medical Evidence Does Not Disprove Sexual Assault When Victim's Testimony Is Credible.

The case involves an appeal by two accused, Sudhir Govindrao Suradkar and Santosh Nathaji Jumbde, against their conviction by the Special Judge (POCSO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392 r/w 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Madhukara @ Madhu @ Mallesha, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Shimoga in S.C. No. 78/2012 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Food Adulteration Proceedings Due to Delayed Complaint Beyond Shelf Life of Sample. Prosecution Not Maintainable as Accused's Right to Reanalysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Was Lost.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of criminal applications filed by various accused persons—proprietors, partners,...