Search Results for "quashing remand order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "quashing remand order"

628 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 628 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind and the delay of over two years in executing the order vitiated the detention.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Naresh Dua, brother of the detenu Rajesh Dua, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order on detenue while in judicial custody and reliance on a criminal case in which detenue was not involved renders the order illegal.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Detenu in Custody Due to Lack of Recorded Satisfaction on Imminent Release. The Court Holds That Preventive Detention Under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Requires Strict Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Article 22 of the Constitution.

24 Nov 2021

The petitioner, Sayed Noor Sayed Nasir, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the preventive detentio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

1 Nov 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Revision Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Remand Ordered for Fresh Adjudication. Failure to provide copies of documents relied upon and denial of effective hearing renders revisional order unsustainable under Section 34 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioners filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.02.2017 passed by the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Lower Appellate Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits. Remand Under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC Requires Satisfaction of Conditions; Appellate Court Cannot Remand Without Deciding Appeal on Merits.

6 Mar 2013

The appellant, Subhash Moralwar, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondents, Vilas Wankhede and others, in the trial co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Accused's Petition in Murder Case Under BNS, Upholding Remand Order Despite Delay in Production. Delay of 25 Minutes in Producing Accused Before Magistrate Does Not Vitiate Remand as Grounds for Arrest Were Furnished and Investigation Ongoing, Citing Article 22(2) of Constitution and D.K. Basu Precedent.

13 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal petition filed by the petitioner, accused No.2, challenging a remand order dated 26-05-2025 and seeking his release ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Urban Land Ceiling Case Due to Failure to Consider Possession Under Repeal Act. The High Court's quashing of orders under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, was set aside as it did not determine if possession was taken by the State, a prerequisite under Sections 3 and 4 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, for proceedings to not abate.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, where the Competent Authority declared 0.865-7 acres as ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SC/ST Act Case by Setting Aside High Court's Remand Order and Upholding Cognizance. Cognizance Order Under Section 204 CrPC Does Not Require Detailed Reasons as Magistrate Applied Mind to Case Diary and Record, Making Remand Unnecessary.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a criminal case involving allegations under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Preve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Remand to Appellate Tribunal in Stage Carriage Permit Dispute under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. High Court's direction to rehear all appeals arising from a single tainted appellate order is valid to prevent public inconvenience.

10 Dec 1965

The dispute arose from the grant of a stage carriage permit on the route Kumbakonam to Neiveli. The Regional Transport Authority, South Arcot, granted...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)